Further to my post a few days ago that the USWNT (U.S. Women’s National Team) lost their lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation, more details have come to my attention.
The USWNT and the USMNT (U.S. Men’s National Team) both had the opportunity to sign one of two contracts: the first was a guaranteed annual salary with benefits. The second was a reward-based system. The better the team does, the more the members get paid.
The women chose the guaranteed annual salary contract. The men chose the reward-based contract.
But when the women won the Women’s World Cup, they decided they chose the wrong contract since they could have made WAY more money if they had chosen the reward-based contract. So they took the U.S. Soccer Federation to court to get changed (retroactively mind you) to a reward-based contract. The judge ruled that they could not change their contract just because they didn’t benefit.
But this is typical of feminism and feminists. They want all of the benefits of being a man but none of the risk. They don’t want the dangerous jobs but they want higher pay. They don’t want the higher risk of suicide and incarceration, but they want more rights. Indeed, they don’t want more rights at all. They want privileges that men don’t have.
The USWNT says they will appeal the ruling, presumably to find a feminist judge who will agree with their baloney excuse to change their contract. Hopefully, no judge is stupid enough to blindly grant the Women’s Team that which they don’t deserve.
-VIS
You must be logged in to post a comment.